Netanyahu’s Gaza Takeover Plan Satisfies No One But Himself

Fundacion Rapala – Nearly two years into the Gaza war, Israel’s security cabinet approved Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s proposal to seize Gaza City. The move ignored military objections and warnings that it could worsen the humanitarian crisis. It also risks the lives of the 50 remaining hostages. Critics argue the plan is more about Netanyahu’s political survival than a clear military strategy.

Political Survival Over Military Advice

Netanyahu’s far-right partners, Itamar Ben Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich, have threatened to collapse his government if the war ends. They demand full occupation of Gaza and restoration of Jewish settlements. Netanyahu instead chose a phased approach focused only on Gaza City. He set a loose two-month deadline, leaving space for possible ceasefire talks that could stop the operation.

Read This : Battlefield 6 Open Beta Faces Performance Issues on Older Ryzen Processors

Military Leaders Strongly Oppose the Plan

During a 10-hour cabinet meeting, IDF Chief of Staff Eyal Zamir warned that reoccupation could trap Israeli forces. He said it would endanger hostages, drain already exhausted troops, and deepen Gaza’s humanitarian crisis. Public opinion polls show most Israelis support a ceasefire to bring hostages home and end the war.

Strained International Relations

Israel faces growing isolation abroad. Even with strong U.S. backing, famine and starvation in Gaza have eroded global support. Germany, Israel’s second-strongest ally, has suspended some military exports. Other EU nations may soon follow.

A Plan Serving Netanyahu Above All

The plan satisfies neither the military, the public, nor Netanyahu’s hardline partners. Analysts say it mainly buys him time. By delaying a choice between ceasefire or escalation, he prolongs the war. This leaves Gaza residents and hostages suffering, while securing his political position.